Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Yan Bai vs Jose Statham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bai vs Statham analysis and find out who is favored!
Yan Bai vs Jose Statham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bai 2 - 3 Statham
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bai has won 53.82% of points on their second serve, while Statham has won 53.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bai, in recent form, has won 56.38% of their opponent's second serve points, while Statham has won 52.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.06% and 24.7% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bai has saved 56.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Statham has saved 55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bai has won 74.39% of matches played (W/L 61/ 21), with Statham winning 36.84% (W/L 14/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bai has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 317/ 168), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Statham has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Bai has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 82% of matches (W/L 41/ 9), where as Statham has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 34.38% of matches (W/L 11/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Bai winning 2 times and Statham being victorious 3 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Bai winning 6 and Statham winning 6. The last match between Bai and Statham was at the M15 Chiang Rai, 20-04-2022, First, Hard with Jose Statham getting the victory 2-6 6-1 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bai and Statham have played a deciding set 2 times, with Bai winning 0 times and Statham 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bai winning 0, and Statham 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bai has played against opponents with an average rank of 141.59 while Statham has played against players with an average rank of 346.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bai has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Statham has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bai has converted 48.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Statham has converted 47.62% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
302
Rank
200
High
35
Age
R
Plays
2
Total3
2
Hard2
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
693
Rank
279
High
37
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
64% (383-213)
Career Total W/L
57% (604-455)
71% (22-9)
YTD W/L
36% (4-7)
$33,720
Career Prize Money
$33,515
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Yan Bai vs Jose Statham For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bai VS Statham
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Yan Bai | Jose Statham |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 6 |
| Games Won | 58 | 59 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:0 | 1:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (138/205) | 68% (149/219) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (90/138) | 69% (103/149) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (32/67) | 44% (31/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (7/24) | 35% (8/23) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (85/219) | 40% (83/205) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (4/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (4/2) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (4/2) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Jose Statham
Player
Yan Bai
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
| 4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Yan Bai
68%
(
94 of
139)
1st Serve %
67%
(
86 of
129)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
65 of
94)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
56 of
86)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
40%
(
55 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
129)
136
Total Points Won
132
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-3 7-5 | |||||
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Yan Bai | Jose Statham |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (22/9) | 36% (4/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (46/23) | 46% (12/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (343/264) | 48% (129/138) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (18/8) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 40 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:15 | 1:32:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 142.42 | 304.45 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1154/1756) | 58% (405/696) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (763/1154) | 69% (280/405) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (324/602) | 54% (156/291) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (113/235) | 48% (20/42) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (893/1956) | 35% (238/674) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (6/3) | 36% (4/7) |
| Futures W/L | 73% (16/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (22/31) | 36% (4/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (6/0) |
Yan Bai Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Nico Hornitschek
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
86%
(
12 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Chase Ferguson
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
79%
(
45 of
57)
3
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
12 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Qian Sun
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Yan Bai
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Yi Zhou
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
1-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Aoran Wang
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
114)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
114)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bai
Player
Seon Yong Han
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moez Echargui
Player
Yan Bai
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
79%
(
34 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Jose Statham Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Jose Statham
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
19 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Jose Statham
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
12
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
31 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
7
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
52
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Jose Statham
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
54%
(
58 of
108)
6
Aces
7
10
Double Faults
6
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
40 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Jose Statham
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Colin Sinclair
Player
Jose Statham
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
110)
13
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
11
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jose Statham
Player
Masamichi Imamura
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Bai Vs Statham Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bai are available here and Statham photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
